131 audiobooks, 1,134 hours of narration. Give $50 and every one is yours.
Puritan books
Cover of The Existence and Attributes of God, Volume Three

Modern English edition · 1682 AD

The Existence and Attributes of God, Volume Three

by Stephen Charnock

The third of four volumes, carrying Charnock's tenth and eleventh discourses: the power of God, argued from Job 26:14, and the holiness of God, argued from Exodus 15:11.

Start reading free

One free account opens 250+ books and saves your place on every device. Google sign-in or an email link. No card.

The Existence and Attributes of God · 4 volumes: Vol. 1Vol. 2Vol. 3Vol. 4

Included with your free account

This book, and 250+ more, free to read

A free account opens the whole library to read online, on your phone or at your desk. Open a book on one device and it is waiting at the same page on the next. The PDF and EPUB of every book are yours to keep, and audiobooks play in the same app.

  • 250+ modernized editions Not samples. The whole work, free.
  • Your place, on every device Phone, tablet or desktop, same page.
  • 131 audiobooks From $4.99 each, or all of them with a $50 gift.
  • PDF and EPUB included Download any book to keep.
Create your free account Google sign-in or an email link. No card.
The in-app reader on a phone, mid-chapter of The Mortification of Sin in modern English
My Library on a phone, with a book to continue reading and the cover grid

Summary

Preached
Crosby Hall, London
Published
1682, posthumously, by Richard Adams and Edward Veal
Type
Doctrinal discourses
Contents
Discourses 10 and 11 of 14
Length
About an 8-hour read

"The Existence and Attributes of God, Volume Three" holds Stephen Charnock's tenth and eleventh discourses, on the power of God and the holiness of God. Charnock argues that omnipotence is essential to God rather than merely displayed by him, and that holiness is the perfection that makes every other attribute worth worshipping.

How the argument unfolds

  1. 01

    The text on power. Job 26:14, “the thunder of his power who can understand?” Job’s catalogue of God’s works, from grain under the soil up to the heavens, is only the outer edge of what God can do.

  2. 02

    What the power is. Strength, not authority: “The power of God, then, is not to be understood as his authority and dominion but as his strength to act.” Absolute power covers whatever is possible; ordinate power covers what God has decreed.

  3. 03

    Why God must be omnipotent. Four reasons, running from the power visible in creatures through the perfection and simplicity of God to the miracles in the world.

  4. 04

    Where the power appears. Creation, the government of the world, then redemption, which Charnock ranks highest: “it would have been easier for divine power to create a new world than to repair a broken one and purify a polluted one.”

  5. 05

    The text on holiness. Exodus 15:11, “Who is like thee glorious in holiness, fearful in praises, doing wonders?” Angels repeat this attribute three times, God swears by it, and Scripture names it more often than Almighty.

  6. 06

    Eight propositions on sin. The volume’s longest section defends God’s purity in every relation he bears to sin, from creating a changeable creature to withdrawing grace.

  7. 07

    The uses. Each discourse closes in instruction, comfort, and exhortation. “Omnipotence is an ocean that cannot be measured, so the comfort flowing from it is a stream that cannot run dry.”

Key themes

  • Power as essential, not just displayed. God holds infinitely more power than he has ever exercised; imagine him restrained in power and you have imagined him limited in essence.
  • Holiness as the beauty of the rest. “Power is the strength of the other attributes, but holiness is their beauty.” Strip it away and “his patience would be indulgence toward sin, his mercy mere fondness, his wrath madness, his power tyranny.”
  • God and the entrance of sin. On the permitting will: “He does not properly will it, but he wills not to hinder it, though by his omnipotence he could put a stop to it” — while God has no part in the sinfulness of the act.
  • Doctrine that ends in use. Neither discourse stops at proof. Each turns the attribute back on the reader, for conviction, comfort, and practice.

On the Power of God

(Job 26:14) “Lo! these are parts of his ways: but how little a portion is heard of him? but the thunder of his power who can understand?”

In the previous chapter, Bildad had lectured Job on the dominion and power of God, and on the purity of his righteousness, from which he argued that no man could be justified in God’s presence, since man is no better than a worm. In this chapter Job acknowledges God’s power and expands on it more fully than Bildad had done, but he prefaces his own speech with a kind of ironic jab, as though Bildad had not spoken as a true friend, or had missed the actual point at issue. Job’s subject had been the worldly prosperity of the wicked and the sufferings of the godly.

Bildad answered instead with a lecture on the extent of God’s dominion, the number of his armies, and the spotless righteousness of his nature, next to which even the purest creatures are foul and crooked. So in verses 1 through 4, Job mocks him for missing the point, for wandering from the matter at hand and applying no remedy fit for the actual wound (verse 2): “How hast thou helped him that is without power? how savest thou the arm of him that hath no strength?” and so on; your speech is so beside the point, Job says, that it will neither strengthen the weak nor instruct the simple (Munster).

But since Bildad had raised the subject of God’s power and treated it so briefly, Job sets out to show that he needs no instruction on that score, and that he has a fuller grasp of it than his opponent had expressed. So from verse 5 to the end of the chapter he speaks grandly of God’s power in several forms. In verse 5 he begins with the lowest: “Dead things are formed from under the waters, and the inhabitants thereof.” You have lectured me, Job says in effect, on God’s power in the heavenly host.

That power is visible there, true, but it reaches further still, and its monuments appear in the lower world too. What of the dead things beneath the earth and the waters, the grain that dies and, watered by the clouds, springs up again in numerous increase for man’s nourishment? What of the varieties of metal and mineral conceived in the belly of the earth, the pearls and riches in the depths of the sea, all midwifed by this power of God? Add to these the vast and varied creatures of the sea, all births of God’s power, both in their first creation by his mighty word and in their ongoing propagation by his sustaining providence.

Nor does his power stop there. It reaches even to hell, whether that means the graves, the resting places of all the crumbled dust that has ever passed through the world (for that is sometimes what Scripture means by “hell”: verse 6, “Hell is naked before him, and destruction hath no covering”). The various resting places of the dead are known to him. No screen can hide them from his sight, and their dissolution poses no obstacle to his power, when the time comes to reassemble those decayed bodies to receive again their departed souls, for reward or for judgment. The grave, or hell, the place of punishment, lies naked before him, seen as distinctly as we see the parts of a naked body, or as a skilled eye sees a dissected one.

Destruction has no covering; no one can escape the power of his hand. Every person in the depths of hell, every person punished there, is known to him and feels the power of his wrath. From the lower parts of the world Job rises to consider God’s power in the creation of heaven and earth: “He stretches out the north over the empty places” (verse 7). The north, or north pole, spreads over the air, which the Greeks called void or empty because of its thinness; and Job names the north for the whole heaven because it is more familiar and visible than the southern pole. “And hangs the earth upon nothing”: the massive, weighty earth hangs like a heavy globe in the middle of thin air, with as much air on one side of it as the other.

The heavens have no prop to hold them up in their height, and the earth has no foundation to support it in its place. The heavens are like a curtain stretched smooth in the air with no hand holding it up, and the earth is like a ball hanging in the air with no solid body beneath it and no cord to keep it from falling, both standing as monuments to God’s omnipotence.

He then turns to God’s daily power in the clouds: “He binds up the waters in his thick clouds, and the cloud is not rent under them” (verse 8). God gathers the waters together in clouds and holds them there by his power against their natural weight and gravity, until they are ready to fall on the earth and do the work he intends for them. “The cloud is not rent under them”; the thin air is not torn apart by the weight of the water held in the cloud above it. He causes the water to fall in drops, straining it, so to speak, through a fine cloth, to refresh the earth, and does not let it fall all at once in a violent flood that would ruin man’s labor and bring famine on the world by destroying its fruits. What a wonder it would be to see even a single drop of water hang just one inch above the ground, unless it were a bubble held by the air enclosed within it!

What a wonder to see a gallon of water held in a thin cobweb as securely as in a vessel of brass! Yet greater is the wonder of divine power in those thin “bottles of heaven,” as they are called (Job 38:37), so called here because they are daily proofs of his omnipotence. That the air should hold up those rolling vessels, apparently heavier than itself; that the force of that mass of water should not burst so thin a prison and rush down to its natural place below the air; that the water should be held day after day against its own inclination by so slight a restraint; that it should fall so gradually and steadily, as if the air were pierced with holes like a gardener’s watering can, rather than falling all at once to flood or drown parts of the earth. These are hourly miracles of divine power, as little noticed as they are plainly visible.

He continues (verse 9): “He holds back the face of his throne, and spreads the clouds upon it.” The clouds serve as curtains covering the heavens, as well as vessels watering the earth (Ps 147:8), like a tapestry hung between the heavens (God’s throne, Isa 66:1) and the earth, his footstool. The heavens are called his throne because his power shines forth most clearly there, magnificently declaring God’s glory; and the clouds serve as a screen between the scorching sun and the tender plants of the earth and the weak bodies of men.

From here Job turns to the sea, and considers God’s power evident in bounding it (verse 10): “He hath compassed the waters with bounds, till the day and night come to an end.” Scripture repeatedly points to this as a clear mark of divine strength (Job 38:8; Prov 8:27). He has measured out a place for the sea and marked its limits as though with a compass, so that it cannot rise above the land and ruin the purpose of the earth’s creation. And this holds true through the passing of day and night, until he shall bring time itself to an end. In many places the boundaries of the raging sea are as fragile as the “bottles” of the upper waters: one is contained by thin air, the other held back by weak sand in many places, though by unyielding rock in others.

So even when the sea swells, foams, roars, and its waves, driven on by strong winds, come like mountains against the shore, they do not overrun it. Instead they humble themselves as they near the sand set as their limit, and withdraw again to the depths that bore them, as if ashamed and repenting of their proud attack. Or this may refer instead to the tides of the sea, and the fixed times God has appointed for its ebb and flow, until night and day come to an end. Either way, that the fluid waters should stay within their bounds, and keep up their perpetually ordered motion, are astonishing proofs of divine power.

Job then turns to the commotions God raises and stills in the air and the earth: “The pillars of heaven tremble, and are astonished at his reproof.” By “pillars of heaven” he does not mean angels, as some suppose, but either the air, called the pillars of heaven because of its place, holding the parts of the world together as pillars join the upper and lower parts of a building, just as the lowest parts of the earth are its foundation.

Called the foundations of the earth, so the lowest parts of the heavens may be called the pillars of heaven (Cocceius, on this passage). Or else by that phrase mountains may be meant, which seem, at a distance, to touch the sky, as pillars touch the top of a structure. This is spoken according to common understanding, which imagines the heavens as sustained by the two extreme parts of the earth, as a convex body arched by pillars. So Scripture, following ordinary perception, mentions the ends of the earth and the utmost parts of the heavens, though properly they have no end, being round.

The power of God is seen in the commotions of air and earth, in thunders, lightnings, storms, and earthquakes, which rack the air and make the mountains and hills tremble like servants before a frowning master. And as he stirs the earth and air, so his power appears in his influence over the sea: “He judges the sea with his power, and by his understanding he smites through the proud” (verse 12). At creation he set the waters into their channels and made the dry land appear as a habitation for man and beast. Or rather, he splits the sea with storms, as if to lay bare the bottom of the deep, raking the sand up to the surface and marshaling the waves into mountains and valleys. Then “he smites through the proud,” that is, he humbles the proud waves, and by calming the storm brings them back to their former level. The power of God shows as clearly in stilling the winds as in stirring them; he makes them obey his voice, exasperating or calming them as he pleases.

The “striking through the proud” here probably does not refer to the destruction of the Egyptian army, since some judge that Job died that year, (Drusius, on this passage), or around the time of Israel’s coming out of Egypt. This discourse, spoken during Job’s affliction, could hardly point to something that happened after his restoration to prosperity.

Now, at last, Job sums up the power of God in the greatest of his works above and the greatest wonder of his works below (verse 13): “By his spirit he hath garnished the heavens; his hand hath formed the crooked serpent,” etc. The greater and lesser lights, sun, moon, and stars, are the ornaments and furniture of heaven, and the whale is a prodigious monument of God’s power, often mentioned in Scripture for this purpose, particularly in this book of Job (ch. 41), and called by the same name of crooked serpent in Isaiah 27:1, where it is applied metaphorically to the king of Assyria or Egypt, or to all oppressors of the church.

Interpreters differ on this crooked serpent: some take it for the constellation astronomers call the dragon, others for the galaxy, that band of fainter stars winding through the heavens. But it is most likely that Job, drawing toward the conclusion of his discourse, joins the two greatest testimonies of God’s power in the world: the highest heavens and the lowest leviathan, here called a bar serpent (as the word signifies in Hebrew), in reference to his strength and hardness, as mighty men are called bars in Scripture: “Her bars are broken things” (Jer 51:30). And because of this display of God’s power in creating this creature, it is particularly named in the catalogue of God’s works, (Gen 1:21): “And God created great whales,” while all the other creatures are lumped together without particular mention.

Job then applies this lesson in the text: “Lo, these are parts of his ways: but how little a portion is heard of him? but the thunder of his power who can understand?” This is only a small glimpse of some of his works of power, the outer edges of it; far more glorious things lie within his own dwelling. Though these works display a stupendous power of the Creator in creation and providence, they are nothing compared to what could be declared of his power. And what could be declared is nothing compared to what could be conceived, and what could be conceived is nothing compared to what lies beyond the conception of any creature. These are mere crumbs and fragments of that infinite power, which, compared to his nature, is like a drop beside the mighty ocean, a whisper beside a peal of thunder (Oecolampadius). What has been said here is like a spark beside the sun, a few lines mentioned in passing, a mere drop of speech.

On the Holiness of God

(Exod 15:11) “Who is like unto thee, O Lord, among the gods? Who is like thee glorious in holiness, fearful in praises, doing wonders?”

This verse is one of the loftiest descriptions of God’s majesty and excellence in all of Scripture (Trapp, on this passage). It is part of Moses’ triumphal song after a great victory, one both real and typical, in which all the church’s future deliverances were bound up. This is the first song on holy record, and it combines thanksgiving with prophecy. It looks back to what God did in delivering Israel from Egypt, and it looks forward to what God would do for the church in later ages. That deliverance was only a rough draft of something far more excellent to be accomplished at the close of the world, when God’s plagues would be poured out on the antichristian powers.

This would revive the same song of Moses in the church, fitted so many ages before for just such a scene (Rev 15:2–3). It has been observed that many words in this song appear in the future tense, pointing to a time still to come. Even the very first word, in verse 1, “Then sang Moses and the children of Israel this song,” is in Hebrew yashir, “shall sing,” implying that the song was composed for the celebration of some greater work of God still to be accomplished (Manasseh ben Israel, On the Resurrection). On this basis, some Jewish rabbis took this remark to teach the doctrine of the resurrection: that Moses and those Israelites would rise again to sing this same song over even greater miracles and greater triumphs than their deliverance from Egypt.

The song has several parts. 1. A preface (verse 1): “I will sing unto the Lord” (Pareus, on Exodus 15). 2. A historical narration of the facts (verses 3–4): “Pharaoh’s chariots and his host hath he cast into the Red Sea,” which Moses ascribes entirely to God (verse 6): “Thy right hand, O Lord, is become glorious in power: thy right hand, O Lord, hath dashed in pieces the enemy.” He speaks prophetically here, looking either to something still to be done in completing that deliverance, or, as others think, to Israel’s entrance into Canaan, since the verbs in these two verses are future tense. The manner of the deliverance is then described (verse 8): “The floods stood up right as an heap, and the depths were congealed in the heart of the sea.”

In verse 9, Moses magnifies the victory by recalling the enemy’s vain confidence and boasting: “The enemy said, I will pursue, I will overtake, I will divide the spoil,” and so on. Then in verses 16–17 he prophetically describes the fruit of this victory in its effect on the nations bordering the road to the promised land: “Fear and dread shall fall upon them; by the greatness of thy arm they shall be as still as a stone, till thy people pass over which thou hast purchased.” The language of this and the following two verses seems too magnificent to describe merely Israel’s arrival in the earthly Canaan. It seems instead to point toward the gathering of God’s redeemed people into the spiritual sanctuary he has established, where the Lord will reign forever without any enemy to disturb his rule: “The Lord shall reign forever and ever” (verse 18). In the midst of this historical account, the prophet seems caught up in ecstasy, breaking out into the stately exaltation of God found in our text.

“Who is like unto thee, O Lord, among the gods?” In Scripture, questions like this are often the strongest form of affirmation or denial. Here it strongly affirms God’s incomparableness and strongly denies that any creature could share in the degrees of his excellence. It sets God above every creature in holiness, before whom even the purity of creatures is only a shadow deserving reverence and awe, since he is “fearful in praises.” The angels themselves cover their faces when they worship him in his particular perfections.

Among the gods. Some take this to mean the idols of the nations. Others (Rivet) note that heathen idols are never given the title “strong” or “mighty,” which is what the Hebrew word translated “gods” implies, and so they understand it instead of angels or other powers in the world, or more broadly, of everyone who bears or claims the title of strength and might in heaven or on earth. God is so great and majestic that no creature can share his praise.

Fearful in praises. This phrase has been read several ways. It may mean “reverenced in praises”: his praise ought to be sung with religious fear, which flows from both his mercy and his justice. As the Psalmist says, “He hath forgiveness that he may be feared” (Ps 130:4). Or it may mean “fearful in praises” in the sense that no one can praise him without being struck with awe at the greatness of his works; none can truly praise him without astonishment (Calvin). Or, “fearful in praises” may mean that no mortal can praise him adequately, since he is above all praise (Munster). Whatever a human tongue can say, or an angel’s mind can conceive, about the excellence of his nature and the greatness of his works, falls short of the vastness of his divine perfection.

A creature’s praise of God falls as far below God’s transcendent greatness as a creature’s very being falls below the eternal fullness of the Creator. Or perhaps, “fearful,” that is, terrible, “in praises” refers to the matter being praised, and the learned Rivet agrees with me in this reading. The works of God celebrated in this song were indeed terrible: the miraculous destruction of a mighty nation’s strength and flower. His judgments were as severe as his mercy was timely. The Hebrew word nora can mean both “glorious and illustrious” and “terrible and fearful.” No one can hear the praise of God’s name for such great acts of judgment without some astonishment at his justice, which flows from his holiness. This appears to be the sense of the following words, “doing wonders”: fearful in the matter of your praise, since these were wonders you performed among us and for us.

Doing wonders. God congealed the waters by a wind so they stood like walls to rescue Israel, then melted them by a wind to overthrow Egypt. These are wonders that call for the greatest adoration, both of the mercy that delivered the one and the justice that punished the other, and of the power by which he accomplished both his gracious and his righteous purposes.

From this we may observe that God’s judgments on his enemies, no less than his mercies to his people, are cause for praise. His perfections appear in both. Justice and mercy are so joined together in his works of providence that we cannot remember one while forgetting the other. He is never more terrible than in the assemblies of his saints and in their deliverance (Ps 89:7). Just as creation was made for his glory, so all his acts of government serve the same end, and his creatures fail to give him his due if they do not acknowledge his excellence in whatever guise it appears, dreadful or pleasing. His terror as well as his righteousness is on display even when he acts as a God of salvation (Ps 65:5): “By terrible things in righteousness wilt thou answer us, O God of our salvation.”

But the phrase I want to take up from the text is glorious in holiness. He is magnified or made honorable in holiness; the same Hebrew word is translated this way in Isaiah 42:21, “He will magnify the law, and make it honorable.” God’s holiness shone forth wonderfully in this great deliverance against the enemies and oppressors of his people. The holiness of God is his glory, just as his grace is his riches. Holiness is his crown, and his mercy is his treasure. This is the blessedness and nobility of his nature; it makes him glorious in himself and glorious to any creature that understands anything of this lovely perfection.

Holiness is a glorious perfection belonging to God’s very nature. That is why Scripture so often calls him the Holy One, the Holy One of Jacob, the Holy One of Israel, and why he is more often called Holy than Almighty. He is set forth by this attribute more than by any other; it is fastened to his name as an epithet more than any other quality. We never read of “his mighty name” or “his wise name,” but we read of “his great name,” and above all, “his holy name.” This is his highest title of honor. It is here that the majesty and venerableness of his name most clearly appear.

When the Holy Spirit condemns the sinfulness of Sennacherib, it draws on this very attribute: “Thou hast lift up thine eyes on high, even against the Holy One of Israel” (2 Kgs 19:22). It does not say against the Wise One, or the Mighty One, but against the Holy One of Israel, since it is holiness above all in which God’s majesty shines forth. This is also why he is called light, just as impurity is called darkness. The two are opposed to one another in exactly this sense: he is pure, unmixed light, free from every blemish in his essence, nature, and works.

Even heathens have acknowledged God’s holiness. Proclus calls him “the undefiled Governor of the world.” The poetical stories the Greeks told about their false gods, and the scandalous acts attributed to them, were, in the judgment of their wisest thinkers, an unholy thing to report or hear (Ammonius, in Plutarch, On the E at Delphi). Some writers even defend Epicurus against the charge of atheism: they argue he did not deny that God exists, but only rejected the adulterous and quarrelsome deities the common people worshiped, since such conduct was unworthy of the divine nature (Gassendi, Physics).

This is why the heathens held that virtue was an imitation of God, and that a virtuous man resembled God. If virtue was a copy of God, then a still greater holiness had to exist in the original. And when some of them struggled to explain how God could be kept free from being the author of sin in the world, they attributed the origin of sin to matter, and fell into the absurd notion that matter was uncreated, so that God might be kept entirely free of any mixture with evil. So sacred to them was the idea of God as a holy God.

Even the most absurd heretics have acknowledged it. The Manichees and Marcionites, who believed evil arose by necessity, still tried to protect God from being its author. They did this by claiming two distinct eternal principles, one of which was the source of evil, just as God was the fountain of good. So deeply rooted was this sense of divine purity that no one would slander goodness itself by attaching to God anything so disparaging (Petavius, Dogmatic Theology).

The nature of God cannot rationally be conceived without holiness. Power is the first rational conclusion we draw from seeing his works; wisdom follows from their order and connection; purity results from their beauty. God, who has made everything so beautiful in its time, cannot be deformed by evil. We cannot form the idea of a God without separating from him everything impure and defiling, whether in his essence or his actions. We may conceive him infinite in majesty, infinite in essence, eternal in duration, mighty in power, wise and unchanging in his counsels, merciful in his dealings with people, and adorned with whatever other perfections befit so sovereign a being. But if we imagine him lacking this excellent perfection, tainted by even the slightest contagion of evil, we turn him into nothing but an infinite monster, and we ruin every perfection we had ascribed to him before.

We would then be worshiping a devil rather than a God. It is a contradiction to be God and to be darkness, or to have even one speck of darkness mixed into his light. It is a lesser wrong to deny God’s existence than to deny his purity: the first makes him no god at all, the second makes him a deformed, unlovely, detestable god. Plutarch put it well when he said he would count himself less injured by a man who denied that Plutarch existed at all, than by one who admitted he existed but claimed he was a debauched, loose, and vicious person. It is a lesser wrong to God to deny his existence entirely and count him as nothing, than to believe he exists but imagine him a base and unholy Deity. Whoever says “God is not holy” speaks far worse than whoever says “There is no God at all.” Consider these two things.

Questions

What is Volume Three of The Existence and Attributes of God about?
Volume Three of Charnock’s Discourses covers two attributes: the power of God, preached from Job 26:14, and the holiness of God, preached from Exodus 15:11. These are the tenth and eleventh of fourteen discourses; the first nine are in Volumes One and Two, the last three in Volume Four.
What does Charnock mean by absolute and ordinate power?
Charnock distinguishes what God can do from what God has resolved to do. “Absolute power is that by which God is able to do what he does not will to do, but which is possible to be done,” while ordinate power is what he has decreed — one power considered two ways, not two powers.
Are there things Charnock says God cannot do?
Yes, and Charnock treats those limits as marks of perfection rather than weakness. Nothing self-contradictory falls under God’s power, such as making a past event never to have happened, and neither does anything contrary to his own nature, such as dying or lying.
Why does Charnock say holiness is God’s greatest attribute?
Charnock argues that holiness stands above God’s other perfections and is the glory of them all. His evidence: angels repeat it three times where no other attribute is repeated at all, God swears by it, and “he is more often called Holy than Almighty” in Scripture.
How does Charnock defend God from being the author of sin?
Charnock answers with eight numbered propositions, each clearing God’s holiness of one charge: creating man changeable, giving a law he knew would be broken, his decree, his will to permit sin, his concurrence in the sinful act, the withdrawal of grace, and two others. He prefaces them by warning that “we should not be too busy or rash in our inquiries and conclusions about the reason for God’s providence in the matter of sin.”
Do I need to read Volumes One and Two first?
No. Each discourse opens from its own scriptural text and carries its own argument through to use, so Volume Three reads on its own.
Portrait of Stephen Charnock

About the author

Stephen Charnock

Stephen Charnock (1628 to 1680) was a Puritan minister who served as chaplain in Dublin under Henry Cromwell before returning to London, where he shared a pulpit at Crosby Hall in his final years. The Discourses he preached there were taken from his own manuscripts and published posthumously in 1682. He is remembered almost entirely for this one work.

“Updated Works has been an incredible blessing to my Christian life and ministry… remarkably faithful to the original authors while making these timeless treasures understandable for modern readers.”
— Pastor Mike Cleveland