131 audiobooks, 1,134 hours of narration. Give $50 and every one is yours.
Puritan books
Cover of The Gospel Mystery of Sanctification

Modern English edition · 1692 AD

The Gospel Mystery of Sanctification

by Walter Marshall

Walter Marshall's 1692 Puritan classic in fourteen Directions: why holiness cannot be produced by self-effort, and how it is received from Christ through union with him by faith. Includes his sermon on justification.

Start reading free

One free account opens 250+ books and saves your place on every device. Google sign-in or an email link. No card.

Buy the paperback · $16.99

Printed to order. Shipping is calculated at checkout. Read online tonight while it ships.

Get the audiobook · $7.99

Listen in the Updated Works app on any device, in the same place you read.

Give $50, get every audiobook

One gift, no subscription. It funds the next modernized classic and the next recording, and includes the whole ebook library as one download.

Listen to the first 9 minutes free

Included with your free account

This book, and 250+ more, free to read

A free account opens the whole library to read online, on your phone or at your desk. Open a book on one device and it is waiting at the same page on the next. The PDF and EPUB of every book are yours to keep, and audiobooks play in the same app.

  • 250+ modernized editions Not samples. The whole work, free.
  • Your place, on every device Phone, tablet or desktop, same page.
  • 131 audiobooks From $4.99 each, or all of them with a $50 gift.
  • PDF and EPUB included Download any book to keep.
Create your free account Google sign-in or an email link. No card.
The in-app reader on a phone, mid-chapter of The Mortification of Sin in modern English
My Library on a phone, with a book to continue reading and the cover grid

Summary

Published
1692 AD · London, posthumously
Type
Puritan practical theology
Structure
14 Directions plus a sermon on justification
Length
About 99,000 words
Based on
The 1859 Robert Carter & Brothers edition

"The Gospel Mystery of Sanctification" is a treatise by the Puritan minister Walter Marshall, published in 1692 AD after his death. In fourteen Directions it argues that holiness cannot be produced by self-effort under the law, but is received from Christ through union with him by faith.

How the argument unfolds

  1. 01

    Learn the means first. Direction 1 warns against rushing into duty without knowing how duty can be done. Most people ask what good thing they must do, not "How shall I be enabled to do anything good?"

  2. 02

    What holiness requires. Direction 2 names four endowments that must come before obedience, and argues that justification must precede sincere obedience rather than serve as its condition.

  3. 03

    Holiness stored in Christ. Directions 3 and 4 locate those endowments in Christ's fullness, received through a mystical union formed by the gospel and faith. Many devout people strain instead to squeeze good qualities from their hearts "like oil from a flint."

  4. 04

    Two states. Direction 5 separates the natural state inherited from Adam from the new state in Christ, and holds that no effort made in the first can produce true holiness.

  5. 05

    Against a covenant of works. Direction 6 answers those who make sincere obedience the condition of salvation, arguing that this turns the new covenant back into a yoke.

  6. 06

    Come as you are. Direction 7 insists no reform is required before trusting Christ: "He came as a physician for the sick and does not expect them to recover even slightly before coming to him."

  7. 07

    Order, comfort, assurance. Directions 8 to 10 set holiness after union and justification, place gospel comfort before duty, and ask for assurance within the very act of faith.

  8. 08

    Walking in the new state. Directions 11 to 13 teach how to begin believing, how to live by the principles of the new man rather than the old, and how to use every appointed means by faith.

  9. 09

    Why this way excels. Direction 14 lists its advantages: it exalts God's grace, agrees with the rest of the gospel, surely leads to holiness, is pleasant, and surpasses every other way.

Key themes

  • Union with Christ. Marshall compares sanctification to original sin: as corruption passed from the first Adam, a new nature passes from the second, and believers contribute no more to producing it than to producing original sin.
  • Comfort before duty. He answers the objection that comfort before obedience is "as unreasonable as expecting wages before work," arguing that gospel peace is what makes sincere obedience possible.
  • Means without self-reliance. Scripture, baptism, the Lord's Supper, prayer, psalms and fellowship are all required, but only as channels of faith. He rejects both those who think they have "risen above every ordinance except singing hallelujahs" and those who invent means God never commanded.
  • Justification as verdict. The appended sermon treats justification as a legal sentence, not an infusion of grace, and calls Romans 3:23-26 "the gospel of the gospel."
The Gospel Mystery of Sanctification paperback

The paperback

Prefer it in print? The same book, done right

$16.99 · 6 × 9 inches · Cream paper · Matte cover

Built to last, not printed cheap

Printed at 6 × 9 inches on cream paper with a matte cover, made to survive years of rereading and underlining.

Type you can actually read

Typeset at a comfortable reading size with generous margins and line spacing, so a long chapter is a pleasure rather than an eye test.

Online reading included

Every paperback comes with the full text in your free account, plus the PDF and EPUB, so you can start reading tonight while the book ships.

Your purchase funds the work

Reading online is free. Buying the paperback direct is what pays for the next modernized classic.

Buy the paperback · $16.99 Printed to order. Includes the ebooks.

Free audiobook preview

Listen to the first 9 minutes

The Gospel Mystery of Sanctification · Audiobook · 10 hr 26 min

0:00 / 9:02

Enjoying it? The full audiobook runs 10 hr 26 min. Listen in the Updated Works app on any device.

Get the audiobook · $7.99

1. Learning the Way to Holiness

To perform acceptably the duties of holiness and righteousness required by the law, our first task is to learn the powerful and effective means by which we may reach so great an end.

Explanation

This direction serves as a preface, preparing the reader to understand and attend to those that follow.

First, it identifies the great end for which all the means discussed in this book are intended. My aim is to teach you how to attain the practice and way of life we call holiness, righteousness, godliness, obedience, and true religion. God requires this of us in the law, especially in the moral law summed up in the Ten Commandments, more briefly in the two great commandments to love God and our neighbor (Matt 22:37, 39), and more fully throughout the Holy Scriptures. My work is to show how the duties of this law can be done once they are known. Do not expect me to delay that purpose with a lengthy explanation of the duties themselves. Several catechisms and commentaries have already done that work.

Yet you must discern the goal if you are to reach it. In brief, the holiness to which I would bring you is spiritual (Rom 7:14). It consists not only in outward works of piety and charity, but also in the holy thoughts, imaginings, and affections of the soul, chiefly in love. All other good works must flow from love, or they are not acceptable to God. Holiness means more than refraining from sinful desires in action. It includes longing and delighting to do God’s will, and obeying him cheerfully, without complaining, fretting, or grudging at any duty as though it were a grievous burden.

Notice also that the law you are aiming to obey is exceedingly broad (Ps 119:96). This does not make it easier to meet its demands: you must aim to obey it in every duty, with an obedience as broad as the law itself, or you cannot meet them at all (Jas 2:10). The Lord is not loved with the love due to him as Lord of all unless he is loved with all our heart, spirit, and might. We must love everything in him: his justice, holiness, sovereign authority, all-seeing eye, and all his decrees, commands, judgments, and actions. We must love him not merely more than other things, but as the only good and the fountain of all goodness. When bodily and worldly enjoyments, even our own lives, compete with enjoying him or doing our duty toward him, we must reject them as though we hated them. We must love him enough to give ourselves wholly to his constant service in everything, and to his disposal of us as our absolute Lord, whether in prosperity or adversity, life or death.

For his sake, we must also love our neighbor, every person, friend or foe. In all matters concerning their honor, life, chastity, worldly wealth, reputation, and contentment, we must do to them whatever we would want others to do to us in the same condition (Matt 7:12). This spiritual and universal obedience is the great end toward which I am directing you. Lest you reject my undertaking as impossible, observe that I promise no more than an acceptable performance of these duties of the law. Our gracious and merciful God will certainly delight in such obedience and be pleased with it during our imperfect life in this world; it will end in perfect holiness and complete happiness in the world to come.

Before I go further, pause to consider the great dignity and excellence of these duties. Esteem the goal highly, so that the means I am about to explain will appear as welcome as they deserve. The chief duties are to love God above all and to love one another for his sake. All other duties flow from these. I cannot imagine a nobler work even for the holy angels in their glorious dwelling. These are the principal works for which we were first formed in the image of God, engraved on humanity at creation. For their sake, that beautiful image is renewed in us through our new creation and sanctification by Jesus Christ, and it will be perfected when we are glorified.

These duties do not depend merely on God’s sovereign choice to command, forbid, leave indifferent, change, or abolish them, as he might with works belonging to the judicial or ceremonial law or with means of salvation prescribed by the gospel. In their own nature they are holy, just, and good (Rom 7:12). They are fitting for us because of our natural relation to our Creator and fellow creatures. They are therefore inseparably connected with the holiness of God’s will and firmly established by it.

The fruits of these works would make those who performed them holy in every part of life, even if no other duties had ever been commanded. Once other duties are commanded, love fully establishes our obligation to perform them. Without love, no holiness of heart or life can be imagined. It was a great honor of the ordinances of Moses, as it is now of the ordinances of the gospel, to serve as means toward the performance of these duties. Those means will cease when their end, this love that never fails, is perfectly attained (1 Cor 13).

We were naturally obliged to these duties by the reason and understanding God gave humanity at creation to discern what is just and fitting. Even those without the written law or supernatural revelation remain obliged to them by the light of nature (Rom 2:14-15). For this reason, they are called natural religion, and the law requiring them is called both natural law and moral law. Everyone’s conduct, whether that of an unbeliever or a Christian, ought to conform to it. If people had conformed to it fully, they would not have fallen short of eternal happiness (Matt 5:19; Luke 10:27-28). Violating it brings the penalty of God’s wrath.

This is the true morality God approves: the conformity of all our actions to the moral law. If those who now contend so strongly for morality mean this and nothing less, I will join them in asserting that the most morally honest person is the greatest saint. Morality is the principal part of true religion and the test of every other part. Without it, faith is dead and all other religious performances are an empty show and mere hypocrisy. For the faithful and true Witness has testified that no commandment is greater than the two great moral commandments to love God and our neighbor, and that all the law and the prophets depend on them (Matt 22:36, 38-40; Mark 12:31).

The second matter in this introductory direction is the need to learn the powerful and effective means by which this great and excellent end can be reached. Learning them must be our first work if we expect any attempt at holiness to succeed.

This warning is much needed. Many are inclined to skip the teaching about the means, which will occupy this whole book, as though it were unnecessary and useless. Once they know the nature and excellence of the law’s duties, they think nothing remains but to perform them diligently. They rush blindly into immediate practice, making haste without making progress. They are quick to promise, “all that the Lord hath spoken, we will do” (Exod 19:8), without first sitting down to count the cost. They regard holiness only as a means to an end, eternal salvation, rather than as an end whose practice requires substantial means of its own.

When most people first become concerned about religion, they ask, “What good thing shall I do, that I may have eternal life?” (Matt 19:16). They do not ask, “How shall I be enabled to do anything good?” Indeed, many who are considered powerful preachers spend all their zeal urging the immediate practice of the law without showing people the effective means of doing it. They speak as though works of righteousness were menial tasks requiring no skill or understanding, only effort and activity. To keep you from stumbling at the very threshold of a religious life through this common oversight, I will show you that knowing what your duty is and why you ought to do it is not enough. You must also learn the powerful and effective means of performing it before you can successfully put it into practice.

For this purpose, I offer the following considerations.

First, by nature we all lack the strength and ability to perform acceptably the holiness and righteousness the law requires. Through the sin of our first father Adam, we are dead in trespasses and sins and are children of wrath, as Scripture testifies (Rom 5:12, 15, 18-19; Eph 2:1-3; Rom 8:7-8). The doctrine of original sin, which Protestants generally profess, is a firm foundation for this assertion and for many others throughout this book. If we believe it, we cannot reasonably encourage ourselves to attempt holy living until we know some powerful and effective means that will enable us to live it.

While man remained upright in the image of God in which he was first created, he could sincerely do God’s will as soon as he knew it (Eccl 7:29; Gen 1:27). But after he fell, he quickly became afraid because he was naked, and could do nothing to remedy his condition until God revealed the means of restoration (Gen 3:10, 15). Tell a strong, healthy servant to go, and he goes; to come, and he comes; to do something, and he does it. A servant confined to bed must first learn how he can be enabled to act.

No doubt the fallen angels know that holiness is necessary and tremble at the guilt of their sin. But they know of no means by which they can effectively attain holiness, and so they remain in their wickedness. It was useless for Samson to say, “I will go out as at other times before, and shake myself,” when he had forfeited his strength through sin (Judg 16:20). People show themselves strangely forgetful or hypocritical when they profess original sin in their prayers, catechisms, and confessions of faith, yet urge themselves and others to practice the law without considering any means to strengthen and enliven them. They act as though the only thing lacking were activity, rather than ability.

Second, even those who doubt or deny original sin can know this about themselves, unless their consciences are blind: because of their actual sins, God’s exact justice stands against them. If God were to enter into judgment with them, they would be under his curse and sentence of death (Rom 1:32; 2:2; 3:9; Gal 3:10). Can someone who knows this is his condition, yet has learned no means of escaping it, immediately practice the law? Can he love God and everything in him, including his justice, holiness, and power as well as his mercy? Can he willingly submit to God’s disposal of him even if God should suddenly put him to death? Does encouraging a fainting soul to practice universal obedience in such a condition require no knowledge or skill at all?

Third, people without Scripture may know much of what the law requires through the common light of natural reason and understanding (Rom 2:14). But that light cannot reveal the effective means of obeying it. Those means must be learned wholly from supernatural revelation. What is our natural light but a few sparks and glimmers of the light Adam had before the fall? Even at its brightest, that light could not have shown Adam how to recover the ability to walk in holiness if he lost it through sin. Nor could it have assured him beforehand that God would grant him any means of recovery. God had set nothing before him but death in the event of transgression (Gen 2:17). When Adam saw the shame of his nakedness, he therefore hid from God, expecting no favor from him.

We are like sheep that have gone astray and do not know the way back until we hear the shepherd’s voice. Can these dry bones live to God in holiness? Lord, you know; we cannot know unless you teach us.

Fourth, sanctification, by which our hearts and lives are conformed to the law, is a grace God communicates to us through means, just as he does justification. It involves teaching us something we cannot see without the Word (Acts 26:17-18). Several things belonging to life and godliness are given through knowledge (2 Pet 1:2-3). God uses a form of doctrine to set people free from sin and make them servants of righteousness (Rom 6:17-18). We must know and put on the several pieces of the whole armor of God if we are to stand against sin and Satan in the evil day (Eph 6:13). Should we overlook the way of sanctification when learning the way of justification has been thought worthy of so many carefully written books?

Fifth, through his inspiration, God has given abundant instruction in righteousness in the Holy Scriptures, “that we may be thoroughly furnished for every good work” (2 Tim 3:16-17). This is especially so since the “day-spring from on high hath visited us” through the appearing of the Lord Jesus Christ, “to guide our feet in the way of peace” (Luke 1:78-79). If God has condescended to teach us this way in the Scriptures and through Christ, it is surely necessary for us to sit at his feet and learn it.

Sixth, far from being known without study of the Holy Scriptures, the way to godliness is harder to learn even when plainly revealed there than the duties of the law are. We know those duties in part by the light of nature and therefore assent to them more readily. But this is the way by which the dead are brought to live to God. It must surely be far above every thought and conjecture of human wisdom. It is the way of salvation in which God will “destroy the wisdom of the wise, and bring to nothing the understanding of the prudent,” revealing by his Spirit things that “the natural man receiveth not; for they are foolishness to him, neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned” (1 Cor 1:19, 31; 2:14). “Without controversy, great is the mystery of godliness” (1 Tim 3:16).

Learning it involves a double task. We must unlearn many deeply rooted ideas and become fools so that we may be wise. We must earnestly pray for the Lord to teach us, as well as search the Scriptures for this knowledge. “O that my ways were directed to keep Thy statutes! Teach me, O Lord, the way of Thy statutes, and I shall keep it unto the end” (Ps 119:5, 33). “Teach me to do thy will” (Ps 143:10). “The Lord direct your hearts into the love of God” (2 Thess 3:5). Surely these saints needed teaching and direction less about which duties the law required than about the way and means by which they might perform them.

Seventh, certain knowledge of these powerful and effective means is of the greatest importance if we are to be established in the true faith and avoid errors contrary to it. We cannot reasonably doubt that the moral duties of loving God and our neighbor are absolutely necessary to true religion, which cannot exist without them. From this principle we may firmly conclude that nothing opposed to the practice of these holy duties should be received as a point of faith delivered by the most holy God. Whatever is truly necessary, powerful, and effective in bringing us to practice them should be believed to come from God, for it bears the image of his holiness and righteousness.

This is a sure test by which those who are seriously religious will try spirits and their teachings to see whether they are from God. They cannot reasonably approve any teaching as religious if it does not accord with godliness (1 Tim 6:3). By this test Christ proves that his teaching is from God, because in it he seeks God’s glory (John 7:17-18). He also teaches us to know false prophets by their fruits (Matt 7:15-16). In judging those fruits, we must especially consider the fruits their teaching tends to produce.

Until we know which means of holiness are effective and which are not, we lack a necessary test of divine truth. We may easily be deceived by false teaching or left merely uncertain about the truth of any religion, like the Seekers. If you mistake ineffective means for effective ones, and effective means for weak or even harmful ones, your error will become a false test for judging other teachings. You will then be ready to approve errors and reject the truth. This has given rise to many harmful religious errors in recent times.

Learn this lesson and gain a true test. You will then be able to examine the differing teachings of Protestants, Papists, Arminians, Socinians, Antinomians, and Quakers, and to discern and hold to the truth with confidence amid the disputes and controversies of our times. You may judge whether the Protestant religion established among us contains any real support for Antinomianism, whether it has any intolerable defect in its principles for holy practice, and whether it deserves to be altered and turned almost upside down by new doctrines and methods, as some learned people in recent times have concluded by the tests they use.

Eighth, this knowledge is also greatly important and necessary if we are to be established in holy practice. We cannot set ourselves to practice holiness with hope of success unless we have some faith that God will assist us. We have no ground to expect that assistance if we do not use the means through which he has appointed to work. “God meeteth them that remember Him in His own ways” (Isa 64:5); he also broke out against those who did not seek him in the appointed order (1 Chr 15:13). He has chosen and ordained means of sanctification and salvation that serve his glory, and those alone he blesses for our good. Nor does he crown anyone who strives unless he “strive lawfully” (2 Tim 2:5).

Experience among both non-Christians and Christians gives abundant evidence of how harmful ignorance or mistaken ideas about these effective means are to holy practice. In general, those without Scripture fell short of acceptable obedience to the duties of the law that they knew because they lacked this knowledge.

(1.) Many Christians content themselves with outward performances because they never learned how to attain spiritual service.

(2.) Many reject the way of holiness as harsh and unpleasant because they do not know how to cut off a right hand or pluck out a right eye without intolerable pain. They would find “the ways of wisdom,” if they knew them, “to be ways of pleasantness, and all her paths to be peace” (Prov 3:17). Their mistake leads them to put off repentance again and again as something strange and forbidding.

(3.) Others begin practicing holiness with fervent zeal and run very fast, yet never take a step along the right path. Repeatedly disappointed and overcome by their sinful desires, they finally give up and return to wallow in the mire. This has prompted several books describing how far a person who will ultimately be rejected may go in religion. Many weak believers are discouraged by them, thinking such people have gone farther than they themselves have. Yet most of those people never knew the right way or took one step in it, for “few there be that find it” (Matt 7:14).

(4.) Some of these misguided zealots subject their bodies to inhumane severity through fasting and other austerities in an effort to kill their sinful desires. When they find that those desires are still too strong for them, they fall into despair. Horror of conscience then drives them to sinfully take their own lives, to the scandal of religion. Perhaps God will bless my account of the powerful means of holiness enough to save someone from doing so. That one result would repay my labor. Yet I hope God will also enlarge the hearts of many, so that they run in the ways of his commandments with great cheerfulness, joy, and thanksgiving.

2. What We Need for Holy Living

Several endowments and qualifications are necessary to enable us to put the law directly into practice. In particular, our hearts must be inclined toward it. We must therefore be well persuaded that we are reconciled to God, that we will enjoy everlasting happiness in heaven, and that we have sufficient strength both to will and to perform every duty acceptably until we enter that happiness.

Explanation

We must first identify the means nearest to the great end we seek. Then we can learn how to obtain them by the other means described in the directions that follow. I have therefore named several qualifications and endowments necessary to form the holy state of soul that equips and enables us to put the law directly into practice. We need them both when we begin and as we continue. Notice carefully that these endowments must remain in us throughout this life, or we will lose our ability to live a holy life. They must also come before practice, though not necessarily earlier in time: they precede it as a cause precedes its effect.

I do not claim to have named every necessary qualification. But I can say this much: anyone who gains these can, by the same means, gain any others that should be counted among them. This deserves serious consideration, for few understand that holy practice requires special endowments beyond those needed for other voluntary actions. The first Adam received excellent endowments for holy practice when he was created in God’s image. The second Adam received still more excellent endowments for a harder task of obedience. Since the fall of Adam, obedience has become more difficult because of the opposition and temptations it meets. We who are to imitate Christ therefore need choice endowments, as he had. At the least, because our work is harder than Adam’s was at first, we need endowments as good as his, or something better.

What king going to make war against another king, sitteth not down first, and consulteth whether he be able, with ten thousand, to meet him that cometh against him with twenty thousand? (Luke 14:31). Shall we rush into battle against all the powers of darkness, the terrors and allurements of the world, and our own deep-rooted, ruling corruptions without considering whether we are spiritually equipped to stand in the evil day? Yet many content themselves with an ability to will and do their duty that, they say, is given to everyone. It equips them no better for spiritual battle than it equips the world at large, which lies conquered under the wicked one. Such an ability offers no security that they will stand. Indeed, it is hard to discover what this universal ability, for which so many contend earnestly, is made of, how it is conveyed to us, or how it is maintained.

Bodily agility depends on animating spirits, nerves, ligaments, and bones. But this supposedly universal spiritual ability seems to be a hidden quality for which no sufficient account can be given. To keep people from deceiving themselves and failing in their pursuit of holiness by depending on such a weak, hidden quality, I have identified four endowments that must make up a true ability to practice holiness, sustain it, and preserve it. I intend to show later how these endowments are given to us and whether the inclination mentioned here is perfect or imperfect.

These endowments are mysterious enough that even some who acknowledge the need to be equipped for holiness think less will suffice. They suppose that some of the endowments, if present before anyone has actually obeyed the moral law, would prepare people for licentiousness rather than holiness. They even think that attitudes contrary to some of them would better prepare us for holiness. Against these suspicions, I will set out a reasoned case for each endowment in the order given in this direction.

In the first place, I assert that an inclination and propensity of heart toward the duties of the law is necessary to prepare and enable us to practice them. I do not mean the blind propensity with which inanimate things and animals perform their natural operations. I mean an inclination suited to intelligent creatures, by which, under the guidance of reason, they are disposed to approve and choose their duty and are averse to sin. The other three endowments named in this direction serve this chief endowment and make it a rational propensity.

This is contrary to the view of those who, zealous for obedience but lacking knowledge, contend so earnestly that free will is both necessary and sufficient to enable us to perform our duty once we know what it is and know that we are obliged to do it. They praise this endowment as the great benefit that universal redemption has bestowed on all humanity. Yet they consider this free will apart from any actual inclination to good. Indeed, they must acknowledge that in most people who possess it, it is burdened by a heart actually bent wholly toward evil. Such free will can never free us from slavery to sin and Satan or equip us to practice the law. It is therefore not worth the strenuous efforts of its defenders. Nor is the will free in the way necessary for holy practice until it is endowed with an inclination toward holiness, as the following arguments show.

First, the duties of the law cannot possibly be performed when the heart is wholly averse or merely indifferent to them, with no good inclination toward their practice. The chief commandment is to love the Lord with our whole heart, strength, and soul: to love everything in him, his will, and all his ways, and to approve of them as good. This love must influence the performance of every duty. We must delight to do God’s will; it must be sweeter to us than honey or the honeycomb (Ps 40:8; Job 23:12; Ps 63:1; Ps 119:20; Ps 19:10). This love, approval, delight, longing, thirst, and sweet relish must continue to the end. Even the first unconsidered motion of desire must be governed by love for God and our neighbor; we must desire what is contrary to sin (Gal 5:17) and abhor sin (Ps 36:4).

If true obedience meant loving duty only as a trader loves muddy roads on the way to market, a sick person loves an unpleasant medicine, or an enslaved captive loves hard labor for fear of a greater evil, then we might perform it while averse or disinclined to it. But we must love duty as the trader loves gain, the sick person loves health, and the captive loves liberty, or as we love pleasant food and drink. Surely the will has no power for this kind of service unless our inclination agrees with God’s will. We need a heart after his own heart, a heart turned away from sin and possessing a kind of antipathy to it. As the proverb says, “Like loves like.” The disposition of the lover must agree with the person or thing loved. Love for God must flow from a pure heart (1 Tim 1:5), cleansed from evil propensities and inclinations. Reason also tells us that the first motions of desire, which occur before choice and deliberation, cannot be avoided without a settled inclination of the heart toward holiness.

Second, the image of God, in which God in his infinite wisdom saw fit to make the first Adam righteous, truly holy, and upright (Gen 1:27; Eph 4:24; Eccl 7:29), consisted in a heart actually bent toward the practice of holiness. It did not consist merely in the will’s power to choose good or evil. That power is neither holy nor unholy in itself; it is only a foundation on which either God’s image or Satan’s may be drawn. Nor did the image consist in an equal inclination toward choosing sin or duty. Such indifference is a wicked disposition in an intelligent creature who knows his duty and equips him only to waver between God and Baal.

God initially set Adam’s soul wholly in the right direction, though Adam could act against that inclination if he chose. We too may be prevailed upon to do some things contrary to our natural inclinations. It is easy to fail in our duty, though great preparation and equipment are required to perform it. The second Adam, the Lord Jesus Christ, was likewise born a holy thing (Luke 1:35), with a holy disposition of soul and an inclination toward goodness. Since the fall has made duty so difficult, can we reasonably hope to rise to the life of holiness from which the first Adam fell, or to imitate Christ, unless we are renewed in some measure according to that same image of God and endowed with such an inclination?

Third, original corruption, by which we are dead to God and godliness from birth and willing slaves to every actual sin until the Son of God makes us free, consists in the heart’s inclination toward sin and aversion to holiness. Without this inclination to sin, what could the law of sin in our members be, that warreth against the law of our mind, and leadeth us captive to the service of sin? (Rom 7:23). What is the poison in us for which people may be called serpents, vipers? What is the spirit of whoredoms in people that keeps them from directing their deeds toward God (Hos 5:4)? How is the tree corrupt before its fruit is corrupt (Matt 12:33)? How can a person be described as abominable and filthy, that drinketh iniquity like water (Job 15:16)? How can the mind of the flesh be continual enmity against God’s law (Rom 8:7)?

I know that blindness of understanding and other things also belong to original corruption and contribute to this evil inclination of the will. Nevertheless, this inclination is itself the great evil, the indwelling sin that produces all actual sins. It must therefore be removed or restrained by restoring the contrary inclination in which God’s image consists. Otherwise we will remain unwilling and unfit for every good work, and whatever freedom the will possesses will be used only in the service of sin.

Fourth, God restores his people to holiness by giving them a new heart, and a new spirit, and taking away the heart of stone out of their flesh, and giving them a heart of flesh (Ezek 36:26-27). He circumcises their hearts so that they love him with their whole heart and soul. He requires us to be transformed in the renewing of our mind, that we may prove what is His acceptable will (Rom 12:2). For the same end, David prays that God would create in him a clean heart, and renew a right spirit within him (Ps 51:10).

If anyone thinks that this new, clean, circumcised heart, this heart of flesh and new, right spirit, has no actual inclination toward good but only a power to choose good or evil, undeservedly called free will, while still inclined toward evil or equally disposed toward both alternatives, I will not spend my labor trying to persuade him. Let him only consider whether David could have called such a heart clean and right when he prayed, Incline mine heart unto thy testimonies, and not to covetousness (Ps 119:36).

The second endowment necessary to enable us to practice holiness, working with the two that follow to produce a rational inclination toward it, is a firm persuasion that we are reconciled to God. We must reckon that the breach in our friendship with God caused by sin has been healed by a secure reconciliation to his love and favor. I include here the great benefit of justification as the means by which we are reconciled to God. Scripture describes justification both as the forgiveness of our sins and as the imputation of righteousness to us (Rom 4:5-7), because both are contained in one justifying act. One act of illumination both drives out darkness and brings in light. One act of repentance contains both the mortification of sin and being brought to life in righteousness. Likewise, any movement from one state to its opposite is a single movement, though we may name it in two ways, according to the state that ends or the state that begins.

Here is a great mystery, contrary to the understanding of ordinary people and even of some learned theologians: we must be reconciled to God and justified through the forgiveness of our sins and the imputation of righteousness before we sincerely obey the law, so that we may be enabled to obey it. They think this doctrine undermines holy practice and serves as a chief support of lawlessness. In their view, the only way to establish sincere obedience is to make it a condition that must be fulfilled before we are actually justified and reconciled to God. Some recent theologians have therefore tried to reshape the earlier Protestant teaching on justification, hoping to make it less open to lawlessness and more effective at securing holy practice.

Their labor is vain and harmful. It tends either toward lawless profaneness or, at best, the appearance of holiness without its reality. True holy practice cannot be secure unless we first gain a persuasion that we are justified and reconciled to God apart from works of the law, so that this persuasion enables us to do those works. I will prove this by several arguments. In the directions that follow, I also intend to show that the persuasion of God’s love which he gives his people tends only toward holiness, although a false persuasion of that love gives many people an occasion for licentiousness.

First, when the first Adam was created and equipped to practice holiness, he enjoyed God’s high favor. No sin was imputed to him, and he was accounted righteous in God’s sight according to his condition at the time, because he had been made upright in God’s image. We have no reason to doubt that these qualities helped him practice holiness and that God in his wisdom judged them good for that purpose. As soon as Adam lost them, he became dead in sin. The second Adam, too, in our human nature, was beloved by the Father and accounted righteous in God’s sight. No sin was imputed to him except what he undertook, by virtue of his office, to bear for others. Can we reasonably expect to imitate Christ and perform obedience more difficult than the first Adam’s before the fall unless we receive comparable advantages through reconciliation, forgiveness of sins, and the imputation of a righteousness God gives us when we have none of our own?

Second, those who know that by nature they are dead under the power of sin and Satan are fully convinced that, if God leaves them to their own hearts, they can do nothing but sin. They know that they can do no good work unless God, in his great love and mercy, is pleased to work it in them (John 8:36; Phil 2:13; Rom 8:7-8). To be encouraged and reasonably inclined toward holiness, they must therefore hope that God will work in them to save them. I leave thoughtful people to judge whether such a hope can be well grounded without a firm persuasion that God is reconciled to us and loves us with a saving love that does not depend on any goodness in our earlier works, but is itself sufficient to produce good works effectively in us.

Questions

What is "The Gospel Mystery of Sanctification" by Walter Marshall about?
It explains how a Christian becomes able to live a holy life. Marshall argues that holiness is not produced by resolve or moral effort but received from Christ through union with him by faith, and then lived out by faith through the means God has appointed.
Who was Walter Marshall?
An English Puritan minister, fellow of New College, Oxford, and vicar of Hursley until the Great Ejection of 1662, who then pastored an Independent congregation at Gosport. This was his only major book.
When was it written?
Marshall wrote it before his death in 1680 AD. It was published in London in 1692 AD.
What are the fourteen Directions?
They are numbered propositions, each followed by an explanation. The first ten lay the foundation (the need for means, union with Christ, faith, justification, comfort and assurance). The last four apply it to believing, daily walking, the means of grace, and encouragement.
Is it hard to read?
The original is dense, with long sentences and many objections answered in turn. This modern English edition keeps every argument and Scripture reference while updating vocabulary and sentence structure. At about 99,000 words it is a substantial read, best taken one Direction at a time.
How does it relate to justification?
Marshall holds that the two are distinct but inseparable: justification is God's verdict of righteousness, sanctification the renewal of heart and life. He insists justification comes first and supplies the ground for holy living, and the closing sermon develops the doctrine in full.

About the author

Walter Marshall

Walter Marshall was an English Puritan minister, born in 1628. He was educated at Winchester College and New College, Oxford, where he became a fellow, and later served as vicar of Hursley in Hampshire. Ejected from that living under the Act of Uniformity in 1662, he became pastor of an Independent congregation at Gosport, where he ministered for the rest of his life. For years Marshall was troubled in conscience, striving after holiness without finding peace, until counsel from the Puritan theologian Thomas Goodwin turned him to trust in Christ's righteousness rather than his own. The convictions he reached shaped the one book for which he is remembered, The Gospel Mystery of Sanctification, which he did not live to see in print. He died in 1680, and the book was published in London in 1692.

Excellent book. John Murray considered it the best book on the doctrine of sanctification ever written.

★★★★★  Bob T.